Re: Looking for alternatives to Edit 2.1

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #12462

#12462

From: Larry Sherman
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 1990 19:27

8 lines
827 bytes

In article <1571@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> jlhaferman@l_eld09.icaen.uiowa.edu 
(Jeffrey Lawrence Haferman) writes:
> How about either Sigma Edit or McSink (both DAs).  McSink is known as
> something else commercially, I can't remember.  McSink is in my opinion
> much better than Edit 2.1 and since it's a DA it's very convenient.


The commercial version is called VANTAGE, [Preferred Publishers]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9820@lindy.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ames!eos!shelby!lindy!slacvm!larry

References: <18148@well.sf.ca.us> <1571@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ames!eos!shelby!lindy!slacvm!larry
From: larry@slacvm (Larry Sherman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Looking for alternatives to Edit 2.1
Message-ID: <9820@lindy.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 4 Jun 90 19:27:20 GMT
Sender: root@lindy.Stanford.EDU (Rooter)
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Lines: 8
References: <18148@well.sf.ca.us> <1571@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>

Reply to Parent Message