Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #12483Re: Path coverage analyzer needed for Mac
From: Rich Siegel
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 1990 01:39
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 1990 01:39
29 lines
1565 bytes
1565 bytes
In article <11055@claris.com> rick@claris.com (Rick Boarman) writes: > >If you find a good coverage tool please let us all know!! I've checked out >a few and so far they all are pretty poor. They require extensive >modifications to be made to your source. Some only work for Pascal and >not for C or C++. > >Why can't someone (Jasik?) create a tool that uses the .SYM and .MAP files >to monitor the program at interrupt or instruction trace level? It sounds >so easy... It sounds easy, but it is in fact highly nontrivial. Both THINK Pascal and THINK C come with code profilers; THINK C's can profile at the function level, and THINK Pascal's can profile at the statement level. Neither requires any modification of the source, except for calls to initialize and terminate profiling and to dump the results. R. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rich Siegel Staff Software Developer Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel "It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3139@husc6.harvard.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!husc6!endor!siegelReferences:
<11223@pixar.UUCP> <11055@claris.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!husc6!endor!siegel From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Path coverage analyzer needed for Mac Keywords: path coverage Message-ID: <3139@husc6.harvard.edu> Date: 6 Jun 90 01:39:36 GMT References: <11223@pixar.UUCP> <11055@claris.com> Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) Organization: Symantec Language Products Group Lines: 29