Re: BinHex 5.0/4.0

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #13511

#13511

From: lmm
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1986 04:39

5 lines
711 bytes

I think the answer is yes.

I've never had binhex 4.0 I've always used binhex5.0 and it's worked
on everything I throw it's way.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <21100009@labsms.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-crg!seismo!sundc!oktext!occrsh!occrsh.UUCP!labsms.UUCP!authorplaceholder

References: <497@necntc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-crg!seismo!sundc!oktext!occrsh!occrsh.UUCP!labsms.UUCP!authorplaceholder
From: lmm@labsms.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: BinHex 5.0/4.0
Message-ID: <21100009@labsms.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 8-Nov-86 23:39:00 EST
Article-I.D.: labsms.21100009
Posted: Sat Nov  8 23:39:00 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Nov-86 00:58:38 EST
References: <497@necntc.UUCP>
Lines: 5
Nf-ID: #R:necntc.UUCP:-49700:labsms.UUCP:21100009:000:129
Nf-From: labsms.UUCP!lmm    Nov  8 22:39:00 1986

Reply to Parent Message