Re: Should we support 64K ROMs anymore?

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #13684

#13684

From: Eric Olson
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1986 17:46

9 lines
998 bytes

Just thought I'd point out that the List Manager is a PACKage, and works
just dandy under the 64K ROMs.

My own opinion is that the RAM HFS should also implement the other missing
routines in the 64K ROM.  Until that's the case, I won't use any of the
routines that exist in the 128K ROM (except, of course, as optimizations
to my own code if it happens to be running under 128K ROM).

-Eric

Technical Details

Message-ID: <813@husc6.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!endor!olson

References: <385@runx.OZ> <1366@hoptoad.uucp> <10023@lanl.ARPA>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!endor!olson
From: olson@endor.harvard.edu (Eric Olson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Should we support 64K ROMs anymore?
Message-ID: <813@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Dec-86 12:46:31 EST
Article-I.D.: husc6.813
Posted: Wed Dec  3 12:46:31 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Dec-86 21:53:42 EST
References: <385@runx.OZ> <1366@hoptoad.uucp> <10023@lanl.ARPA>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: olson@endor.UUCP (Eric Olson)
Organization: Aiken Computation Lab, Harvard University
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message