Re: Chirping DataFrame

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #13810

#13810

From: Christian Wiedmann
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1986 00:09

6 lines
963 bytes

Apparently several drive manufacters HAVE suggested that the anti-static
brushes are not necessary. In fact, a DataFrame representative said that
it was ok to remove the brush. According to him it was a holdover from 
older drives. Supposedly many newer drives don't incorporate this feature.

-Christian

Technical Details

Message-ID: <976@zen.BERKELEY.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!zen!zooey.Berkeley.EDU!c160-aw

References: <8611132112.AA14575@cory.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!zen!zooey.Berkeley.EDU!c160-aw
From: c160-aw@zooey.Berkeley.EDU (Christian Wiedmann)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Chirping DataFrame
Message-ID: <976@zen.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Thu, 13-Nov-86 19:09:21 EST
Article-I.D.: zen.976
Posted: Thu Nov 13 19:09:21 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Nov-86 01:25:02 EST
References: <8611132112.AA14575@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: news@zen.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: c160-aw@zooey.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Christian Wiedmann)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message