🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #13916

Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?

#13916
From: Who is John Galt ?
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1986 15:18
18 lines
1245 bytes
>In article <476@runx.OZ> baron@runx.OZ (Jason Haines) writes:
>>Come on people, how about some discussion to the point of whether
>>the ol' 64K ROMs should be supported by developers!
>>	Jason Haines

I am of the opinion that the time spent on making an application run
on all Macs is a waste and that time could be better spent in making
the product bug free (if there is such a thing). If the product turns
out to be good and just what the user needs he/she can then upgrade to
the new ROMS.

 

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            atheism all the way!!
Atul Kacker
UUCP    : {allegra|seismo|decvax}!rochester!ur-tut!akk2
Technical Details
Message-ID: <907@ur-tut.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!ur-tut!akk2
References: <476@runx.OZ> <1490@hoptoad.uucp>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!ur-tut!akk2
From: akk2@ur-tut.UUCP (Who is John Galt ?)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?
Message-ID: <907@ur-tut.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Dec-86 10:18:01 EST
Article-I.D.: ur-tut.907
Posted: Wed Dec 17 10:18:01 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Dec-86 02:05:34 EST
References: <476@runx.OZ> <1490@hoptoad.uucp>
Reply-To: akk2@ur-tut.UUCP (Who is John Galt ?)
Organization: Univ. of Rochester Computing Center
Lines: 18