Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #13948

#13948

From: David Phillip Oster
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1986 05:09

11 lines
1297 bytes

I left the office for a few minutes this afternoon, and when I returned
the following had mysteriously appeared on my screen:

Greetings to you, from the 68000 processor. Life forms think that we're
just a hunk of silicon, but we care, just like anybody else ... excuse
me ... SystemTask ... There, that's better.  Anyway, I just wanted to let
you know that we processors feel that the 64K ROMs should be supported,
and we think our opinions should count! 

Remember our feelings the next time you write some code. Remember: We
don't write the stuff, we just work here.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2025@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!lapis.berkeley.edu!oster

References: <476@runx.OZ> <1490@hoptoad.uucp> <907@ur-tut.UUCP> <4939@reed.UUCP> <1986Dec19.114200.23189@utcs.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!lapis.berkeley.edu!oster
From: oster@lapis.berkeley.edu (David Phillip Oster)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?
Message-ID: <2025@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Sat, 20-Dec-86 00:09:25 EST
Article-I.D.: jade.2025
Posted: Sat Dec 20 00:09:25 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Dec-86 08:42:21 EST
References: <476@runx.OZ> <1490@hoptoad.uucp> <907@ur-tut.UUCP> <4939@reed.UUCP> <1986Dec19.114200.23189@utcs.uucp>
Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: oster@lapis.berkeley.edu.UUCP (David Phillip Oster)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message