Re: TN #110 on mod.mac.binaries

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #13956

#13956

From: liberte
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1986 03:20

5 lines
744 bytes

I have found that BinHex 5.0 croaks on the technical notes while
xbin (on Unix) consistently succeeds.  Don't know why there is a difference.

dan

Technical Details

Message-ID: <164500012@uiucdcsb>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsb!liberte

References: <944@gould9.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsb!liberte
From: liberte@uiucdcsb.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: TN #110 on mod.mac.binaries
Message-ID: <164500012@uiucdcsb>
Date: Sun, 21-Dec-86 22:20:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.164500012
Posted: Sun Dec 21 22:20:00 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 22-Dec-86 18:44:19 EST
References: <944@gould9.UUCP>
Lines: 5
Nf-ID: #R:gould9.UUCP:944:uiucdcsb:164500012:000:147
Nf-From: uiucdcsb.cs.uiuc.edu!liberte    Dec 21 21:20:00 1986

Reply to Parent Message