Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #14056

#14056

From: William L. Rupp
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1987 16:32

10 lines
1063 bytes

In article <16748@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> munson@ernie.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Ethan Munson) writes:

>The reality appears to be that most Mac owners now have a Plus or a
>512Ke. 
>Ethan Munson

Really?  I wonder.  Is there any reliable statistical evidence to
support this view?  I am not arguing one way or another, just curious
about this point.  Some posters are saying more or less the same thing,
but without hard supporting data, it's all conjecture.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <452@cod.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!sdcsvax!nosc!cod!rupp

References: <476@runx.OZ> <781@rosevax.UUCP> <945@gould9.UUCP> <16748@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!sdcsvax!nosc!cod!rupp
From: rupp@cod.UUCP (William L. Rupp)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?
Message-ID: <452@cod.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 6-Jan-87 11:32:17 EST
Article-I.D.: cod.452
Posted: Tue Jan  6 11:32:17 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 6-Jan-87 22:38:57 EST
References: <476@runx.OZ> <781@rosevax.UUCP> <945@gould9.UUCP> <16748@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: rupp@cod.UUCP (William L. Rupp)
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message