Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #14129

#14129

From: Sydney University Macintosh Soci...
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1987 06:58

8 lines
984 bytes

In article <16748@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> munson@ernie.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Ethan Munson) writes:
>
>product.  I suspect that in three years, many programs will require
>the 128K ROMs, if the extra features are really useful.
>

Three years? Don't you think the 256K ROMs (or even the 1 Meg ROMs) may be
necessary for the upmarket Macintosh family software?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <582@runx.OZ>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!otc!metro!ipso!runx!clubmac

References: <476@runx.OZ> <781@rosevax.UUCP> <945@gould9.UUCP> <16748@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!otc!metro!ipso!runx!clubmac
From: clubmac@runx.OZ (Sydney University Macintosh Society)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Should 64K ROMs be supported?
Message-ID: <582@runx.OZ>
Date: Fri, 9-Jan-87 01:58:03 EST
Article-I.D.: runx.582
Posted: Fri Jan  9 01:58:03 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 11-Jan-87 09:39:18 EST
References: <476@runx.OZ> <781@rosevax.UUCP> <945@gould9.UUCP> <16748@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: James Tiberius Kirk @ The Mutara Nebula
Organization: RUNX  Un*x Timeshare. Sydney, Australia.
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message