🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #14488

Re: Hard disks

#14488
From: pri=8 Ephraim Vishniac x76659 ms...
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1987 14:13
29 lines
2149 bytes
In article <1647@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>, boris@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (Boris Altman) writes:
> I've heared that there is a difference in grades of Seagate disks.
> The highest grade going to biggest clients like IBM and the lowest
> going to small companies.
> So, if I buy a disk from Jasmin say for $600 do I really get a disk
> of lower quality than if I buy a GCC (or someone elses) product for
> twice as much? Is the grade of the disk marked anywhere on the disk?
> Should a buyer be concerned about it or there is practically
> no difference? I hope qualified people can explain the difference.
> 
Last night, I repeated this rumor to Mark James of Jasmine Computer.  He
gave the following explanation of how such a false rumor might have
started.  Seagate does sell its disks with a variety of no-cost options.
So, it's true that the disks received by different purchasers are
different.  The difference is *not* in quality, however, and the differences
are at the customer's request.

For the ST225N, options include: noise
level (there's a "low-noise" 39dB option); LED; terminating resistors; and
mounting arrangements.  Mark cited two differences between the drives used
by Apple and those used by Jasmine: Jasmine uses Seagate's LED (what does
Apple do?) and Jasmine uses Seagate's terminating resistors (Apple makes
you buy a separate cable terminator for extra $$).

Ephraim Vishniac
decvax!wanginst!wang!ephraim

Claimer: I have a business relationship with Jasmine.  But you can call
and ask them for yourself.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <377@wang.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!clyde!masscomp!wang7!wang!ephraim
References: <1647@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <376@wang.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!clyde!masscomp!wang7!wang!ephraim
From: ephraim@wang.UUCP (pri=8 Ephraim Vishniac x76659 ms 014 590)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Hard disks
Message-ID: <377@wang.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 16-Jan-87 09:13:30 EST
Article-I.D.: wang.377
Posted: Fri Jan 16 09:13:30 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Jan-87 22:48:34 EST
References: <1647@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <376@wang.UUCP>
Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA
Lines: 29
Keywords: hard disk
Summary: Jasmine's rebuttal of rumor