MacSnap Memory Upgrade from Dove

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #14876

#14876

From: Cliff Loucks
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1987 16:14

21 lines
1415 bytes

Awhile back there was a poor recommendation out of MIT
for the MacSnap memory upgrades.  The folks at Dove say
they have fixed the earlier problems and they now have
a good product (not that they admitted it was bad before).

Since I have a Hyperdrive in my 512KE, most of the memory
upgrades around will not fit, leaving Dove and MacDoctor.
I would get the MacDoctor upgrade but is as yet only
promised and not available.  I'm curious if any has gotten
the Dove product recently and what their experience was.

Cliff

P.S. Having submitted articles in the past with absoutely
no response, I suspect that my postings are not getting
past unmvax.  So, if a few of you wouldn't mind, please
reply (email) just to let me know you've seen this.  Thanks.

-- 
Cliff Loucks   cmcl2!lanl!unm-la!unmvax!sandia!intvax!loucks
Sandia National Labortories, Albuquerque, New Mexico

Technical Details

Message-ID: <199@intvax.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!beta!unm-la!unmvax!sandia!intvax!loucks

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!beta!unm-la!unmvax!sandia!intvax!loucks
From: loucks@intvax.UUCP (Cliff Loucks)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: MacSnap Memory Upgrade from Dove
Message-ID: <199@intvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 5-Mar-87 11:14:08 EST
Article-I.D.: intvax.199
Posted: Thu Mar  5 11:14:08 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Mar-87 22:46:30 EST
Distribution: na
Organization: Sandia National Labs, Org. 1411, Albq, NM
Lines: 21
Keywords: Have they improved?