Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #15086Re: What happened to the 'universal window manager interface'?
From: bob
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1987 17:24
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1987 17:24
16 lines
1492 bytes
1492 bytes
I probably shouldn't mention this, but just yesterday I started on
porting X windows to the ST. I know what your going say: "But I was
told that it is impossible to put X windows on a single tasking machine."
I don't believe this. I've been studying X and have assessed the changes
which must be made to make X run on the ST.
I don't know anything about the 'universal window manager interface,'
but X windows is becoming a standard. Perhaps X can be the portable interface
that you are looking for. I should have something running within 2 months.
If anyone else is also doing the port, I would like to here from them so
that I don't duplicate ongoing work.
Bob Amstadt
trwrb.uucp!wiley!bob
csvax.caltech.edu!wiley!bob
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<458@laurel.wiley.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ucla-cs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!wiley!bobReferences:
<7331@boring.mcvax.cwi.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ucla-cs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!wiley!bob From: bob@wiley.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: What happened to the 'universal window manager interface'? Message-ID: <458@laurel.wiley.UUCP> Date: Tue, 7-Apr-87 12:24:13 EST Article-I.D.: laurel.458 Posted: Tue Apr 7 12:24:13 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Apr-87 03:56:13 EST References: <7331@boring.mcvax.cwi.nl> Organization: TRW Inc., Redondo Beach, CA Lines: 16 Keywords: X windows In-reply-to: guido@mcvax.cwi.nl's message of 5 Apr 87 21:54:32 GMT Posting-Front-End: GNU Emacs 18.36.2 of Mon Feb 23 1987 on laurel (berkeley-unix)