Re: An SE Owner's Comments

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #15263

#15263

From: jimb
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1987 06:54

22 lines
1613 bytes

In article <1365@tekig4.TEK.COM) bradn@tekig4.UUCP (Bradford Needham) writes:
)Did all you Mac+ owners notice that the SE (and Mac II)'s 256K Rom will never
)be put in Mac+'s?  Now you know what us "obsolete" old Rom owners have felt
)like for the past year.  I hope the experience makes a few die-hard technoids
)realize that owners of old equipment are not stupid, poverty-stricken, or
)backward.

Obnoxious.

Comparing the $300 investment I took to go from old to new ROM to the
$2000+ investment I must take to go to the SE.

If you could afford the upgrade to the new ROMs, and didn't, the words
stupid and backward might apply. 

Was that the entire point of the posting? To tell us you could afford
a Mac SE now?
-- 
+===== Jim Budler ==== Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ==== (408) 749-5806 =====+
|  Compuserve: 72415,1200; Delphi: JIMBUDLER;  Usenet: jimb@amdcad.AMD.COM   |
+==== Disclaimer: My company wouldn't let ME speak for them, would they? ====+
Who needs four?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <321@dopey.AMD.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!cae780!amdcad!dopey!jimb

References: <1365@tekig4.TEK.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!cae780!amdcad!dopey!jimb
From: jimb@dopey.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: An SE Owner's Comments
Message-ID: <321@dopey.AMD.COM>
Date: Thu, 26-Mar-87 01:54:21 EST
Article-I.D.: dopey.321
Posted: Thu Mar 26 01:54:21 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Mar-87 02:39:50 EST
References: <1365@tekig4.TEK.COM>
Reply-To: jimb@dopey.AMD.COM (Jim Budler)
Distribution: world
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, Ca.
Lines: 22
Keywords: obnoxious

Reply to Parent Message