Re: Dove memory upgrades

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #15667

#15667

From: bill coderre
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1987 11:57

14 lines
1250 bytes

I was the one who posted the bad experiences with Dove MacSnap memory
upgrades. I claimed their chip clips were poorly done, resulting in
poor contact.

Well, that was several months ago, and Dove claims to have improved.
The one MacSnap which a local dealer got working is still functioning
flawlessly, in a Hyperdrive no less. (Most other upgrades don't claim
Hyper compatibility.)

My suggestion: find a local dealer who swears up and down that they
can install MacSnaps no problem. Then pay her a reasonable amount of
money to prove her assertion.

And let us know,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,bc

Technical Details

Message-ID: <981@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!bacchus!mit-eddie!mit-amt!bc

References: <MS.V3.18.cl1x.80022013.speers.ibm032.1018.1@andrew.cmu.edu> <2016@k.cc.purdue.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!bacchus!mit-eddie!mit-amt!bc
From: bc@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU (bill coderre)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Dove memory upgrades
Message-ID: <981@mit-amt.MEDIA.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 21-Apr-87 06:57:10 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-amt.981
Posted: Tue Apr 21 06:57:10 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 22-Apr-87 02:29:42 EST
References: <MS.V3.18.cl1x.80022013.speers.ibm032.1018.1@andrew.cmu.edu> <2016@k.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 14
Summary: Maybe it's time to try them again

Reply to Parent Message