Re: Macintosh III?

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #16986

#16986

From: David HM Spector
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1987 20:36

16 lines
844 bytes




No, no no...its got to be a Macintosh II+, or maybe even a Macintosh IIe..

I wouldn't name _anything_ after the AppleIII, not that the AppleIII was such 
a bad machine...it wasn't, but the Titanic wasn't such a bad ship either!

1/2 :-}    

David Spector
Senior Systems Programmer
GBA Computer Center, NYU
Spector@kl.gba.nyu.edu
Spector@NYU

Technical Details

Message-ID: <170006@acf3.NYU.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!acf3!spector

References: <IUrGzGy00WI8zYk1sn@andrew.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!acf3!spector
From: spector@acf3.NYU.EDU (David HM Spector)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Macintosh III?
Message-ID: <170006@acf3.NYU.EDU>
Date: Mon, 22-Jun-87 16:36:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf3.170006
Posted: Mon Jun 22 16:36:00 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 24-Jun-87 07:11:22 EDT
References: <IUrGzGy00WI8zYk1sn@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message