Re: Why RoloAcc bombs under 4.1/5.5

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #17947

#17947

From: Patrick van Kleef
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1987 23:23

22 lines
1116 bytes

In article <3695@well.UUCP> alcmist@well.UUCP (Frederick Wamsley) writes:
>The 2B6 -> A78 patch can be dangerous if done in a desk accessory.
>
>A78 is the address of an area in low memory which is reserved as a 
>scratchpad for applications.  If you try running the patched Rolo
>under an application which uses A78 for its own purposes there will be
>a conflict.
>-- 
>

Could you plz tell what location would be a safe one? From now
on I'd like to keep both RoloAcc _and_ my data in applications ;)

Thanx in advance

Paul

[such
a
waste
of
space]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1074@ark.cs.vu.nl>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mcvax!botter!ark!kleef

References: <1070@ark.cs.vu.nl> <3695@well.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mcvax!botter!ark!kleef
From: kleef@cs.vu.nl (Patrick van Kleef)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Why RoloAcc bombs under 4.1/5.5
Message-ID: <1074@ark.cs.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 7-Aug-87 19:23:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: ark.1074
Posted: Fri Aug  7 19:23:42 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Aug-87 10:09:30 EDT
References: <1070@ark.cs.vu.nl> <3695@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: kleef@cs.vu.nl (Patrick van Kleef)
Organization: VU Informatica, Amsterdam
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message