🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <418@aucs.UUCP> peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) writes:
>In version 1.0 of LSC (I never received an upgrade?), the assembler
>interface was very poor, no inline, no assembler provided, nothing
>but a routine to convert MDS rel files to be capatible with LSC rel 
>files. What is provided in the current LSC 2.11 version for using
>assembler?

Version 2.01 of LSC introduced an inline assembler capability. It's worth
noting that this is not your standard "pass this text through to the
assembler pass" type of inline assembly (which we couldn't do anyway, since
there is no assembler pass). Inline assembly is fully integrated into the
compiler via a new C statement of the form:

   asm {
      ;Insert your assembly language statements here
   }

Since the inline assembler is integrated, you can directly reference C
functions and variables by name and it will assemble into the appropriate
A5 or A6 relative reference. If your assembly code is imbedded in a C 'for'
statement, you can still use 'break' and 'continue', and you can always
use 'return'. #define'd identifiers are honored. And so on.

There are lot's more details, of course, but I think you get the general
flavor...

   Jon Hueras
   THINK Technologies, Inc.