Re: Byte benchmark articles (Re: Mac C Compilers)

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #18552

#18552

From: Warwick Bolam
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1987 05:12

18 lines
1222 bytes

I think the offensiveness of the Byte article stems from the fact that
it is heades "68020 vs 80386" when it should have been headed "Machine X
using 68020 vs. 80386".  If you want to compare raw processor speed,
then don't do what BYTE did.

Warwick Bolam
Dept of Computing
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
124 La Trobe St
Melbourne, Victoria 3000
AUSTRALIA

PHONE:  (03) 660 2348                 	OVERSEAS: +61 3 660 2348

ARPA:   wjb%goanna.oz@seismo.css.gov    BITNET: wjb%goanna.oz@CSNET-RELAY
CSNET:  wjb@goanna.oz                   JANET:  goanna.oz!wjb@ukc
UUCP:  {enea,hplabs,mcvax,prlb2,seismo,ubc-vision,ukc}!munnari!goanna.oz!wjb

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1069@goanna.oz>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!munnari!moncskermit!goanna!wjb

References: <3560@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <13885@topaz.rutgers.edu> <213@casemo.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!munnari!moncskermit!goanna!wjb
From: wjb@goanna.oz (Warwick Bolam)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Byte benchmark articles (Re: Mac C Compilers)
Message-ID: <1069@goanna.oz>
Date: Fri, 28-Aug-87 01:12:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: goanna.1069
Posted: Fri Aug 28 01:12:28 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Aug-87 17:30:39 EDT
References: <3560@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <13885@topaz.rutgers.edu> <213@casemo.UUCP>
Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message