Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #18637Flames about Multifinder
From: hallett
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1987 14:25
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1987 14:25
65 lines
3757 bytes
3757 bytes
Organization:
I think I've just about had it with this Multifinder sham that Apple
is pulling on all of us. First off, it cost us $49 to get the thing.
Ok, they had distribution costs and all of that so that's ok.
However, now they say that it requires 2Meg! If that's not bad
enough, System 4.1 craps Switcher, leaving all of us without any
alternative except to get Multifinder. So really Mulitfinder costs
~$549 including the $500 to get a CMOS upgrade to 2Meg.
Personally, I think this sucks. I'm a heavy Mac user, but not a real
power user. For the vast, vast majority of things I do, 1Meg is
sufficient. Yeah, I want 2Meg someday, but can't do it now. However,
Apple is leaving me no choice if I want to keep my Switcher-like
environment (I like Switcher A LOT. As far as I am concerned, it is
the best piece of software Apple ever produced, and I use it quite
frequently.). As I see it, there are only a few alternatives:
1. Don't use System 4.1/Finder 5.5. This is unpleasant since the new
Finder has some nice features in it and System 4.1 has some Toolbox
enhancements that new programs (will) require.
2. Don't use Switcher. This is more unpleasant than using the old
System and Finder.
3. Buy a 2Meg upgrade. Great idea, except I think my wife would like
to eat more than watch me use Multifinder. This will eventually be
the solution.
For me, these alternative are unpleasant. I am not alone. What about
the poor slob college student (I'm one of those too, BTW) that uses
Switcher on his upgrade Mac+ that he gave up clothing and food for and
can't afford another Meg? He's stuck (or she's stuck) too.
I'm not suggesting that we revolt or anything, and I'm not really
blaming Apple. After all, this is how free enterprise works. You
introduce a product. Then, introduce a better one and make it as
inconvenient for the people to keep using the older, less expensive
one as possible, forcing them to upgrade. Maybe Apple should apply
their user-friendliness guidelines to their business and support as
well. It looks to me like Apple is taking the first step to shutting
out the Mac Plus users by upping the memory, speed and memory
management constraints (mostly satisfied by Mac II's now, I'll add).
Now, that I've made myself out to be a complete jerk in front of a lot
of people, I will say that normally, I don't complain about much.
Apple can placate me by simply fixing Switcher so I can use it. I
will gladly get Multifinder when I get my 2Meg (probably over the
winter when the cost of the CMOS upgrades get as cheap as the DRAM
ones). Until then, I want a tool I can use.
Well, this should initiate some good discussion. All I ask is that
people discuss what I've said and not attack me personally. It won't
do any good anyway.
Take care,
Jeff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many"
-- Kirk (STIII)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7177@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!uunet!steinmetz!macbeth!hallettShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!uunet!steinmetz!macbeth!hallett From: hallett@macbeth.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Flames about Multifinder Message-ID: <7177@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Date: Tue, 1-Sep-87 10:25:30 EDT Article-I.D.: steinmet.7177 Posted: Tue Sep 1 10:25:30 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 3-Sep-87 01:41:41 EDT Sender: root@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP Reply-To: hallett@macbeth.steinmetz () Lines: 63