🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3905@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> jww@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU (Joel West) writes:
>if you ask why Color QD isn't in the SE ROM's, I would like to
>add two other points to the earlier observations:
>  1) Most (all) of the code was written in 68020 assembler, 
>     so there would be some version control problems if a 68000
>     version were needed for the SE.  That adds more development
>     time.

That's right.  Also, CQD on a 8MHz 68000 would be VERY slow - it takes
advantage of 68020 instructions to do its job faster.  I'm sure most color
users would not put up with the performance.

>  2) The code wasn't finished until April or so.  It would have
>     held up the SE, which instead was available for retail
>     purchase soon after the March announcement.

Absolutely.  The SE ROMs were finished more than two months before the
completion of CQD.  Not a good tradeoff.

My notes:
A reasonable color system requires at least as much power as a Mac II.
The performance considerations are too important.  The Mac SE was designed
to be 99% compatible or better with the Mac Plus, and putting in a
68020 would have made that impossible.  Besides, a color Mac SE would have
to retail for close to $5000.  For that much money, you may as well get
the higher performance machine.

						_emt