🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3372@sdcc6.ucsd.EDU> ir353@sdcc6.ucsd.edu.UUCP (Matthew Grayson) writes:
>Of course, the author of the above article has no connection with
>the makers of Lightspeed pascal. He's just mentioning it to be
>helpful :-) :-) :-).

	As a matter of fact, yes. I was simply stating the fact that
Macintosh Pascal is no longer supported (by Apple, who's supposed to support
it), and that Lightspeed Pascal is the best alternative, since it's
100% source-compatible with Macintosh Pascal. For now, ignore the
fact that THINK pays me. :-) They pay me for what I do for customer
support, and not for what I say on the net. No free advertising from
*this* guy. :-|

>Now I don't have any connection with the makers of LSP, and I think
>it's the best programming environment since sliced bread. When it
>supports 68881 code, I'll dump MPW in the waste basket. (Yes, I only
>write applications under 300K, or whatever the macho limit is for
>MPW afficianados.) THINK has done a terrific job preserving the 
>ease of Mac Pascal and upping the power. BRAVO.

	Thank you for your kind words, and I shall pass them along to
the person who's taking the blame-- uh, working on LSP. :-)

		--Rich


**The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily
represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc).

Richard M. Siegel
Customer Support Representative
THINK Technologies, Inc.

Uucp: {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer
Internet/Arpanet: singer@harvard.harvard.edu

No one writes programs that work right the first time. If they did,
I'd be out of a job.