Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #20253Re: LSC 2.11 stdio bug
From: Richard Siegel
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1987 00:42
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1987 00:42
17 lines
1366 bytes
1366 bytes
In article <6769@prls.UUCP> gardner@prls.UUCP (Robert Gardner) writes:
>It seems that THINK was not very careful with their stdio implementation
>and verification, though the rest of it is wonderful. Luckily, most
Well, um, er.... As a matter of fact, the stdio and unix libraries
*are* going to get reworked, and will be available for the next release of
LightspeedC, if not sooner.
I do appreciate the comments...
--Rich
**The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily
represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc).
* Richard M. Siegel | {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer *
* Customer Support | singer@endor.harvard.edu *
* THINK Technologies, Inc. (No snappy quote) *
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2993@husc6.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!singerReferences:
<17539@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> <6769@prls.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!singer From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Richard Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: LSC 2.11 stdio bug Message-ID: <2993@husc6.UUCP> Date: Tue, 13-Oct-87 20:42:08 EDT Article-I.D.: husc6.2993 Posted: Tue Oct 13 20:42:08 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 15-Oct-87 05:09:33 EDT References: <17539@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> <6769@prls.UUCP> Sender: news@husc6.UUCP Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Richard Siegel) Organization: THINK Technologies, Inc., Bedford, MA Lines: 17