Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #20888Re: Parity on Apple memories
From: dennisg
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1987 14:42
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1987 14:42
12 lines
1041 bytes
1041 bytes
Just to add to this ( slightly ) I will state that parity memory would be both a waste of time and money. ECC is MUCH more effective but would definitely slow things down and $$COST$$ a lot more. Just test it at boot time... -- Dennis Grittner City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (612) 298-4402 Room 700, 25 W. 4th St. 55102 "Let's just put Ollie, Ronnie, and the rest in jail!"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3591@pwcs.StPaul.GOV>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!rochester!bbn!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!meccts!pwcs!dennisgReferences:
<15260@clyde.ATT.COM> <7118@oliveb.UUCP> <793@alliant.Alliant.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!rochester!bbn!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!meccts!pwcs!dennisg From: dennisg@pwcs.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Parity on Apple memories Message-ID: <3591@pwcs.StPaul.GOV> Date: Wed, 28-Oct-87 09:42:00 EST Article-I.D.: pwcs.3591 Posted: Wed Oct 28 09:42:00 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 31-Oct-87 16:56:27 EST References: <15260@clyde.ATT.COM> <7118@oliveb.UUCP> <793@alliant.Alliant.COM> Reply-To: dennisg@pwcs.StPaul.GOV (Dennis Grittner) Followup-To: comp.sys.mac Organization: City of St. Paul Public Works Lines: 12