Re: CMS Drives

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #21034

#21034

From: Tom Schenck
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1987 03:16

13 lines
1069 bytes

 Well, considering that the maximum data transfer rate is 1.5 meg/sec, and
that Apple is supposed to have an 80-meg drive at about the same speed as the
CMS (seeing that they both use the same mechanical, and the EPROM contains
similar code), I really don't see any difference in the two. In MY opinion, 26
ms is rather slow for an 80-meg drive, and BORDERLINE for a 40-meg...

  That *IS* just my opinion.


UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!maddie
ARPA: crash!pnet01!maddie@nosc.mil
INET: maddie@pnet01.CTS.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1931@crash.CTS.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!tektronix!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!ames!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!jack!man!crash!pnet01!maddie

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!tektronix!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!ames!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!jack!man!crash!pnet01!maddie
From: maddie@pnet01.cts.com (Tom Schenck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: CMS Drives
Message-ID: <1931@crash.CTS.COM>
Date: Fri, 30-Oct-87 22:16:51 EST
Article-I.D.: crash.1931
Posted: Fri Oct 30 22:16:51 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 5-Nov-87 06:29:29 EST
Sender: news@crash.CTS.COM
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon, CA
Lines: 13