Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #2111Re: Apple vs. Microsoft: Press Release & commentary
From: ra_robert
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 1989 19:06
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 1989 19:06
23 lines
1282 bytes
1282 bytes
In article <30257@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, wilson@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU (James E. Wilson) writes... >I've seen about 10 opinions on the ruling so far. Only two have shown it in >a positive light for Apple: >1) the Apple press release. >2) a stock broker specializing in Apple stocks. >Everyone else, newspaper reporters, legal experts, etc, has used phrases like >"stunning legal blow for Apple". A San Francisco Chronicle article about the For what it's worth, the New York Times article that I read about it didn't imply that it was a "stunning legal blow for Apple". In fact, my impression was that the article/reporter felt that Apple had come out ahead. I'll keep my opinion to myself, but just thought I'd set the record straight. Robert ------ ra_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu ------ generic disclaimer: all my opinions are mine
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4729@tank.uchicago.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!tank!ra_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!tank!ra_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu From: ra_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Apple vs. Microsoft: Press Release & commentary Message-ID: <4729@tank.uchicago.edu> Date: 29 Jul 89 19:06:27 GMT Sender: news@tank.uchicago.edu Distribution: na Organization: University of Chicago Graduate School of Business Lines: 23