🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3987@watdragon.waterloo.edu>, palarson@watdragon.waterloo.edu (Paul Larson) writes:
> I have heard some murmurs (they weren't loud enough to be be termed complaints) that some (many?  all?) compilers for the mac produce code of questionable 
> efficiency.  I don't know enough assembly to prove or disprove this statement.  Is there any merit to these murmurs?
> 
> Please post replies to comp.sys.mac.  If this is true I should think it deserves net discussion (not to mention _outrage_.)

Although not a compiler efficiency problem, I have noticed that when LSC links together a file which uses a certain library, it includes the entire libary even if only one procedure/func in the lib is actually called.  When it links in a project, each object in the project (or whatever you wish to term it) is linked in in its entirety even if only one proc/func w/in it is actually called.

I know that this id documented...  I'd guess that it's probably done bec. it's faster....  and I can understand that.  But when the Build Application (or code/da) is invoked, I feel that we should have the option of having the final form of the prgm optimized.

Before, using the MacTraps w/2.01, I've had relatively small prgms (20-35k) come out 3-8k smaller than they do now under the 2.11 MacTraps.  Those numbers add up
.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond Lau                      {allegra,philabs,cmcl2}!phri\
Big Electric Cat Public Unix           {bellcore,cmcl2}!cucard!dasys1!raylau
New York, NY, USA                               {sun}!hoptoad/         
GEnie:RayLau   Delphi:RaymondLau   CIS:76174,2617
"Take it and StuffIt."