🚀 go-pugleaf

	I have a Mac 512ke.  I can fit one project per disk without too much
hassle, but I usually end up with well under 100k of disk space left.  If
an optimising compiler uses up more disk space,  I will have to stick with
the older, unoptimisting version I already have.
	Most of my projects spend far more time in development than in use.  The
savings from optimising appear modest at this stage.  They are of little 
value *to me* (in other words I find other improvements of more pressing
importance).
	Let me propose an alternative that would alleviate the burden of
optimisation by hand.  If rumours of a symbolic debugger are correct,
perhaps we could have a command to take selected program source which has
already been compiled, and append the compiled assembler code.  This would
provide a base for hand optimisation.

Roland Conybeare
(conybear@moncsbruce.oz)