Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #21226Re: Compiler efficiency
From: The Apathist
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1987 23:02
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1987 23:02
17 lines
1384 bytes
1384 bytes
Recently singer@endor.UUCP (Richard Siegel) said:
>
>I agree that it would be desirable to link on a procedure-by-procedure
>basis, but there are tradeoffs: project files will get bigger, and
>build times will get slower.
While I chose Lightspeed mostly for it's compile-link-and-run speed,
the build time it uses doesn't matter to me significantly. At the
most, I use "Build Application" about twice a month. Doing it that
often, I wouldn't mind if it had to go back and recompile everything,
and take half an hour, if it would give me a well-optimized product.
--Tom Lippincott
..ucbvax!bosco!lippin
"There is no place I know like the land of pure imagination..."
--W. Wonka
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1380@cartan.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!ucbvax!cartan!wheatena!lippinReferences:
<3987@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1881@dasys1.UUCP> <3105@husc6.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!ucbvax!cartan!wheatena!lippin From: lippin@wheatena (The Apathist) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Compiler efficiency Message-ID: <1380@cartan.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Wed, 4-Nov-87 18:02:43 EST Article-I.D.: cartan.1380 Posted: Wed Nov 4 18:02:43 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 7-Nov-87 16:41:58 EST References: <3987@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1881@dasys1.UUCP> <3105@husc6.UUCP> Sender: nobody@cartan.Berkeley.EDU Reply-To: lippin@wheatena.UUCP (Tom Lippincott, ..ucbvax!bosco!lippin) Organization: UC Berkeley Math Department Lines: 17