Re: Possible LSC improvements

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #21293

#21293

From: Stew Rubenstein
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1987 08:57

13 lines
1224 bytes

In article <6650@apple.UUCP> lsr@apple.UUCP (Larry Rosenstein) writes:
>Note that the latest System (4.2) will work fine on 512K machines with 64K
>or 128K ROMs.  (I admit that I haven't tried this, but System 4.1 worked.)
>The size of the patches, however, reduces the amount of working RAM, so it
>is not recommended by Apple.

Are you certain of this?  I seem to remember noticing that PTCH 105 was
NOT in system 4.2, although it is in 4.1.

Stew Rubenstein
Cambridge Scientific Computing, Inc.
UUCPnet:    seismo!harvard!rubenstein            CompuServe: 76525,421
Internet:   rubenstein@harvard.harvard.edu       MCIMail:    CSC

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3119@husc6.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!stew

References: <6523@prls.UUCP> <9370001@hpfclp.HP.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!stew
From: stew@endor.harvard.edu (Stew Rubenstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Possible LSC improvements
Message-ID: <3119@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Nov-87 03:57:23 EST
Article-I.D.: husc6.3119
Posted: Fri Nov  6 03:57:23 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Nov-87 11:30:36 EST
References: <6523@prls.UUCP> <9370001@hpfclp.HP.COM>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: stew@endor.UUCP (Stew Rubenstein)
Organization: Aiken Computation Lab Harvard, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message