Re: Possible LSC improvements

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #21335

#21335

From: Larry Rosenstein
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1987 01:07

21 lines
1226 bytes

In article <3119@husc6.UUCP> stew@endor.UUCP (Stew Rubenstein) writes:
>
>Are you certain of this?  I seem to remember noticing that PTCH 105 was
>NOT in system 4.2, although it is in 4.1.

Right you are.  (I did say that I hadn't checked System 4.2 before making my
comment.)  Also, the patch for the Mac XL is not in System 4.1, but is in
System 3.2.

This means developers would have to ship System 4.1 if they wanted to
support 512K machines with old ROMs as well as other machines.

-- 
Larry Rosenstein

Object Specialist
Apple Computer

AppleLink: Rosenstein1
UUCP:  {sun, voder, nsc, mtxinu, dual}!apple!lsr
CSNET: lsr@Apple.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6656@apple.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!pyramid!voder!apple!lsr

References: <6523@prls.UUCP> <9370001@hpfclp.HP.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!pyramid!voder!apple!lsr
From: lsr@apple.UUCP (Larry Rosenstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Possible LSC improvements
Message-ID: <6656@apple.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Nov-87 20:07:02 EST
Article-I.D.: apple.6656
Posted: Fri Nov  6 20:07:02 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Nov-87 21:47:44 EST
References: <6523@prls.UUCP> <9370001@hpfclp.HP.COM>
Reply-To: lsr@apple.UUCP (Larry Rosenstein)
Organization: Advanced Technology Group, Apple Computer
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message