Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #21522Re: Compiler efficiency
From: singer
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1987 20:34
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1987 20:34
19 lines
1426 bytes
1426 bytes
In article <4285@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> borton@net1.UUCP (Chris Borton) writes:
>Thank you Alan for the description of [in]efficient 68000 code generation.
>
>I am curious to hear 'expert' opinions on the code generated by LightspeedC,
Me too. :-)
I'm not sure I can talk about LSC's code generation, and I know I can't
talk about the runtime constructs, but I'll see what I can say, and post
at a later time.
--Rich
**The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily
represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc).
* Richard M. Siegel | {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer *
* Customer Support | singer@endor.harvard.edu *
* Symantec, THINK Technologies Division. (No snappy quote) *
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3181@husc6.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!husc6!endor!singerReferences:
<3987@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <304@fairlight.oz> <1730@pdn.UUCP> <4285@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!husc6!endor!singer From: singer@endor.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Compiler efficiency Message-ID: <3181@husc6.UUCP> Date: Thu, 12-Nov-87 15:34:43 EST Article-I.D.: husc6.3181 Posted: Thu Nov 12 15:34:43 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 14-Nov-87 14:52:45 EST References: <3987@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <304@fairlight.oz> <1730@pdn.UUCP> <4285@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> Sender: news@husc6.UUCP Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Richard Siegel) Organization: THINK Technologies, Inc., Bedford, MA Lines: 19