Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #21540Re: Mac II C compiler ?'s
From: drc
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1987 14:50
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1987 14:50
15 lines
1238 bytes
1238 bytes
You should also look at MacTutor-an excellent magazine concerned solely with programming the Mac. No fluff at all. So far as C compilers go, I agree that LSC is an excellent choice (I use it on occasion and most of my friends use it), but I like the MPW environment and can tell you from experience that on a Mac II, the difference in turnaround time is not noticeable. MPW does generate smaller (often markedly), faster (slightly) code than does LSC. Dennis Cohen Ashton-Tate Glendale Development Center dBASE Mac Development Team -------------------------- Disclaimer: Opinions expressed above are mine, leave A-T out of the discussion.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<260@dbase.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!elroy!mahendo!jplgodo!wlbr!scgvaxd!ashtate!dbase!drcReferences:
<17300001@symcom> <11540040@hpsmtc1.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!elroy!mahendo!jplgodo!wlbr!scgvaxd!ashtate!dbase!drc From: drc@dbase.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Mac II C compiler ?'s Message-ID: <260@dbase.UUCP> Date: Thu, 12-Nov-87 09:50:34 EST Article-I.D.: dbase.260 Posted: Thu Nov 12 09:50:34 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 14-Nov-87 16:38:15 EST References: <17300001@symcom> <11540040@hpsmtc1.HP.COM> Organization: Ashton Tate Development Center Glendale Cal. Lines: 15 Summary: Additional info