Re: LSC 2.13 upgrade bug

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #21876

#21876

From: Richard Siegel
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1987 15:47

29 lines
1654 bytes

In article <9690@ut-sally.UUCP> brian@ut-sally.UUCP (Brian H. Powell) writes:
>
>The question is:
>
>	Has Inside Mac Volume V renamed the constant so that "iPfMaxPgs" is
>	correct, or did THINK goof and accidentally rename it incorrectly?

	I looked at the MPW Pascal 2.0 interfaces, and the constant is spelled
	"iPfMaxPgs", with the lower-case "f". It could be a minor slipup
	on Apple's part, it could be a change in casing scheme, or
	it could be none of the above.

>     If it's the former, is it my imagination, or has Apple abandoned their
>casing scheme?

	I think that one instance of a case change doesnt constitute
an "abandonment" of the casing scheme.

>Brian H. Powell

		--Rich


**The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily
represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc).

* Richard M. Siegel | {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer    *
* Customer Support  | singer@endor.harvard.edu			    *
* Symantec, THINK Technologies Division.  (No snappy quote)         *

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3252@husc6.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!singer

References: <9690@ut-sally.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!singer
From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Richard Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: LSC 2.13 upgrade bug
Message-ID: <3252@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Nov-87 10:47:16 EST
Article-I.D.: husc6.3252
Posted: Thu Nov 19 10:47:16 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Nov-87 19:36:32 EST
References: <9690@ut-sally.UUCP>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Richard Siegel)
Organization: THINK Technologies, Inc., Bedford, MA
Lines: 29
Keywords: iPFMaxPgs, printmgr.h

Reply to Parent Message