Re: Installer 2.5 glitches

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #21962

#21962

From: Frederick Wamsley
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1987 09:07

10 lines
1043 bytes

Tech Note 75 says, roughly, "Installer performs poorly on single-drive
systems.  This is expected to be improved in the future."

Shortly after System 4.1 came out there were rumors that systems put
in without the installer weren't always reliable.  Was this random
noise, or can you cause trouble by having unnecessary resources in
your system file?

(TN75 also answers someone's question about why Installer was looking
for the alarm clock).

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4511@well.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!ptsfa!well!alcmist

References: <18374@amdahl.amdahl.com> <174400075@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!ptsfa!well!alcmist
From: alcmist@well.UUCP (Frederick Wamsley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Installer 2.5 glitches
Message-ID: <4511@well.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Nov-87 04:07:09 EST
Article-I.D.: well.4511
Posted: Sun Nov 22 04:07:09 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 24-Nov-87 04:48:24 EST
References: <18374@amdahl.amdahl.com> <174400075@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu>
Reply-To: alcmist@well.UUCP (Frederick Wamsley)
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message