Re: BITNET and Apple Liscensing

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #22031

#22031

From: Ira Fuchs
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1987 12:51

15 lines
1282 bytes

In article <450UD069225@NDSUVM1>, UD069225@NDSUVM1.BITNET (Eric H. Romo) writes:

>Why hasn't or why doesn't BITNET get an Apple liscense to distribute the new
>System, Finder, and related files? This only seems reasonable for such a large
>network of users, in my mind at least.

I have spoken with Apple about licensing this software for distribution through
MACserve and the main problem with doing it is that Apple requires an auditable
list of all users who receive a copy (has to do with their copyright). This
may not be feasible given the way MACSERVE operates, however discussion
continues.

Ira Fuchs
President, BITNET Inc.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3929@pucc.Princeton.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!gatech!udel!princeton!phoenix!pucc!FUCHS

References: <450UD069225@NDSUVM1>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!gatech!udel!princeton!phoenix!pucc!FUCHS
From: FUCHS@pucc.Princeton.EDU (Ira Fuchs)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: BITNET and Apple Liscensing
Message-ID: <3929@pucc.Princeton.EDU>
Date: Tue, 24-Nov-87 07:51:25 EST
Article-I.D.: pucc.3929
Posted: Tue Nov 24 07:51:25 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Nov-87 22:30:09 EST
References: <450UD069225@NDSUVM1>
Reply-To: FUCHS@pucc.Princeton.EDU
Organization: Princeton University, NJ
Lines: 14
Disclaimer: Author bears full responsibility for contents of this article

Reply to Parent Message