Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #22792Re: ** Stuffit ** vs Packit
From: Werner Uhrig
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1987 17:27
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1987 17:27
13 lines
932 bytes
932 bytes
...I run either Switcher or MultiFinder all the time and (you may not have noticed yet) StuffIt-1.20 requires a significant larger junk of memory to run than PackIt, and I often don't have that much memory left lying around .... What am I saying? If someone could come out with a StuffIt version which only does the unpacking (and which could, therefore, run in 128k or less, hopefully), I for one would be much happier. -- werner@rascal.ics.utexas.edu (prefered address) kraut@ut-ngp.uucp (if you must)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7034@ut-ngp.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!ut-ngp!krautReferences:
<156@escargot.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kraut From: kraut@ut-ngp.UUCP (Werner Uhrig) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: ** Stuffit ** vs Packit Message-ID: <7034@ut-ngp.UUCP> Date: 11 Dec 87 17:27:58 GMT References: <156@escargot.UUCP> Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas Lines: 13 Keywords: Stuffit, Packit. Summary: I like and use StuffIt, but ....