Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #23197Re: SE vs II revisited
From: Jeff T. Segawa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1987 19:40
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1987 19:40
17 lines
1252 bytes
1252 bytes
In article <2225@crash.cts.com> mkao@crash.CTS.COM (Mike Kao) writes:
>
>My concerns are:
>
>1) that the Mac II, a new machine, won't turn out to be another "Apple ///" or
> "Lisa."
>2) Is compatibility gap between older Macs and the II lessening? Are companies
> offering upgrades? How about games -- are there more Mac games that wor
> with the II now?
>
(1) I don't think you have to worry about that. Just an opinion here.
(2) It seems as if many new games are taking Mac II compatibility into
account, though it's hard to say how many of the existing games will
be rewritten.
Unless games (particularly arcade games) and portability are a big concern,
I'd go for the II. I prefer the II's larger, color screen, as it feels less
cramped and easier on the eyes. The open architecture is also a big plus.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1393@uhccux.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!sdcsvax!nosc!humu!uhccux!cm450s02References:
<37414@sun.uucp> <2225@crash.cts.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!sdcsvax!nosc!humu!uhccux!cm450s02 From: cm450s02@uhccux.UUCP (Jeff T. Segawa) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: SE vs II revisited Message-ID: <1393@uhccux.UUCP> Date: 29 Dec 87 19:40:55 GMT References: <37414@sun.uucp> <2225@crash.cts.com> Reply-To: cm450s02@uhccux.UUCP (Jeff T. Segawa) Organization: U. of Hawaii, Manoa (Honolulu) Lines: 16