Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #23479Re: Patton Vs. Rommel vs. MacII
From: Ed Tecot
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1988 23:51
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1988 23:51
19 lines
1364 bytes
1364 bytes
In article <6093@cisunx.UUCP> jasst3@cisunx.UUCP (Jeffrey A. Sullivan) writes: >I talked to the people at Electronic Arts, and they told me that Patton vs >Rommel was NOT mac II compatible. Hmm. The problem is that the II I'm >getting is the 5M one. > >I don't think you can trick the II into thinking it is a 1M machine, because >you had to move the 256K SIMMs to the second bank and put the 1M SIMMs in the >low bank for the extra memory to be recognized, so where the 256K SIMMs are >in a 1M machine is not where they are in a 5M machine. Sigh... > >Anyone who REALLY knows what they're talking about, please correct me ;-) Well, I know nothing about Patton vs. Rommel; but I'd imagine that the problem runs much deeper than memory size (I'd guess that it works OK on a 4M MacPlus). You can't fool the Mac II into thinking it is 1M, but you can fool everything that runs on it into thinking that. Simply set your RAM cache to 4096K. _emt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7161@apple.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!voder!apple!tecotReferences:
<6093@cisunx.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!voder!apple!tecot From: tecot@apple.UUCP (Ed Tecot) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Patton Vs. Rommel vs. MacII Message-ID: <7161@apple.UUCP> Date: 10 Jan 88 23:51:25 GMT References: <6093@cisunx.UUCP> Reply-To: tecot@apple.UUCP (Ed Tecot) Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, USA Lines: 19