Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #23519Re: Copy protection and the consumer (dongles)
From: James Jones
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1988 12:23
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1988 12:23
17 lines
1335 bytes
1335 bytes
In article <1852@optilink.UUCP>, cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes: > At least that's the theory, and if they worked, they would be a perfectly > acceptable way of copy protecting very expensive software (though not > justifiable for software that sells for, say, $30). Well...if I'm running OS-9 on my CoCo 3, or running Multifinder on a Mac, or using an Amiga, how many dongles do I need? (Can they stack up on the serial port? Even if they can, what if I shell out from a terminal program while online and decide I need to use a dongle-protected program?) If I dial my home computer up from elsewhere, can I get a robot arm to install the dongle for me? :-) (It would have to call me back if I only had one serial port. :-) All this, combined with the extreme ease with which I'm sure I'd lose dongles, doesn't make me like them very much. Cheers, James Jones
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<598@mcrware.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcrware!jejonesReferences:
<4663@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <22628@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <1852@optilink.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcrware!jejones From: jejones@mcrware.UUCP (James Jones) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.misc Subject: Re: Copy protection and the consumer (dongles) Message-ID: <598@mcrware.UUCP> Date: 21 Jan 88 12:23:28 GMT References: <4663@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <22628@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <1852@optilink.UUCP> Organization: Microware Systems Corp., Des Moines, Ia. Lines: 17 Summary: dongles vs. multitasking