Re: C vs. Pascal for the mac

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #23663

#23663

From: Paul A. Suhler
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1988 14:48

12 lines
985 bytes

In article <8801152323.AA06669@cory.Berkeley.EDU> dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes:
>however, the better the programmer, the more prone to C he becomes.  The
>semantic structure of C more closely resembles the capabilities of modern
>microprocessors (read: 80x86, 680x0, uVAX-II), at least when compared to 
>Pascal...

Tony Hoare reportedly remarked that C isn't too bad a language,
except for the pdp-11 assembly instructions in it.

:-)
-- 
Paul Suhler        suhler@im4u.UTEXAS.EDU	512-474-9517/471-3903

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2504@im4u.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!im4u!suhler

References: <8801152323.AA06669@cory.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!im4u!suhler
From: suhler@im4u.UUCP (Paul A. Suhler)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: C vs. Pascal for the mac
Summary: Hoare's comment on C
Message-ID: <2504@im4u.UUCP>
Date: 16 Jan 88 14:48:50 GMT
References: <8801152323.AA06669@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: suhler@im4u.UUCP (Paul A. Suhler)
Distribution: na
Organization: Univ of Texas Electrical & Computer Engineering Dept
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message