Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #24297Re: MacUser compiler comparison
From: Paul Larson
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1988 15:40
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1988 15:40
15 lines
1064 bytes
1064 bytes
The MacUser article was obviously written for the no-technical reader.
For example, they begin by explaining the differece between a compiler and
an interpreter! Also, they fail to adress the topic of code quality and
execution speeds on compilers.
I've stopped reading MacUser; the articles began to seem increasingly
trivial. Anyway, the articles were difficult to find amidst all the ads.
Johan Larson
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posting from the | Secrecy is the keystone of all tyranny.
account of Paul Larson | - Heinlein
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4879@watdragon.waterloo.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watdragon!palarsonReferences:
<10870@shemp.UCLA.EDU> <17669@topaz.rutgers.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watdragon!palarson From: palarson@watdragon.waterloo.edu (Paul Larson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: MacUser compiler comparison Message-ID: <4879@watdragon.waterloo.edu> Date: 29 Jan 88 15:40:15 GMT References: <10870@shemp.UCLA.EDU> <17669@topaz.rutgers.edu> Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 15