Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #24372Expressionist vs. MathType
From: Charles C. Allen
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1988 03:43
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1988 03:43
16 lines
899 bytes
899 bytes
It appears that there are people out there who have used both
Expressionist and MathType. I currently use Expressionist, but am
interested in MathType. Here's your big chance to convince me to
spend $150 on MathType (Expressionist can be had for $50).
Some of the things I'm interested in:
* How smart is it about recognizing standard functions when
deciding to italicize things?
* Can it do TeX to equation as well as equation to TeX?
* How does the printed output compare to that generated by
Expressionist and TeX?
Charlie Allen cca@newton.physics.purdue.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<981@pur-phy>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!iuvax!pur-ee!pur-phy!ccaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!iuvax!pur-ee!pur-phy!cca From: cca@pur-phy (Charles C. Allen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Expressionist vs. MathType Message-ID: <981@pur-phy> Date: 31 Jan 88 03:43:55 GMT Organization: Purdue Univ. Phys Dept, W.Lafayette, IN Lines: 16