🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <10515@santra.UUCP> jmunkki@santra.UUCP (Juri Munkki) writes :


>I mailed the source and binaries for my Mandelbrot DA about a month
>ago. This DA features background processing, a window, a menu and
>a dialog box. It also has a goodbye kiss procedure. I don't think
>that I've left out anything that a normal DA might do.
...
>I would like to know why large things like the esperanto stack,
>nethack, RISK and some other really large stuff gets posted while
>small programs have to wait for months. I'd like to hear from the
>moderator, if he hasn't gotten my mail. (Try routing your mail throbout
making votes on what stuff gets posted? The moderator

Yes. Large binaries are interesting but examplative sources are much
more interesting (and often shorter).  I don't know what's happening in
comp.sources.mac, but the flow of articles there is ridiculously small
(e.g. one for the whole january and nothing for february !).  

Is the moderator (i.e. Roger Long ?) on holidays, ill or mysteriously
moderated ? Or maybe is he overloaded as he has to manage
comp.binaries.mac and comp.sources.mac [if he is, why not split that
work among 2 people?] ?

Yves Bernard.
Philips Research Lab, Brussels.
bernard@prl2.uucp