🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4998@nsc.nsc.com> curry@nsc.UUCP (Ray Curry) writes:
>I encountered the bug in the 1040 EZ when doing my son's taxes.  Since he
>shows as a dependent on my return, he no longer gets to declare himself as
>a dependent.  That's one of those "loop holes" that got closed in the reform.
>Anyway the tax computation showed zero tax.  I had to use the 1040A form 
>instead.  At this point I'm not sure its worth the cost of a phone call to
>get that fixed unless I call to check on my California version.  Last year
>it arrived about the first week in April so I haven't started worrying yet.
>Anyway I don't know all the combinations that cause the problem but would
>guess that the zero dependent caused the problem.

Actually, it's a known bug in MacInTax which they are sending fixes out to
all _registered_ owners of MacInTax.  The problem is not related to zero
dependents, but in fact it just does not calculate tax on a 1040EZ at all.

As to the CA schedule, I got mine two days ago, but I ordered mine in Nov '87.


-- 
 Richard Scorer       *   UUCP: {ames,apple,portal,sun,voder}!claris!richard
 Claris Corporation   *   AppleLink: Scorer1   *   CompuServe: 74017,344
 "These are my opinions, and you can't hold me responsible for them"