Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #25999Re: LightSpeed C, and C++
From: Alastair Dallas
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 1988 00:50
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 1988 00:50
10 lines
925 bytes
925 bytes
Yes, Think should add object concepts to C. Yes, they should borrow heavily from the C extensions defined in AT & T's C++. But they should be integral--like the old Clascal language from Apple. There are a lot of reasons for this: symbolic debugging and a fast edit-compile-run cycle have already been mentioned. We need Lightspeed C++, not a version of C++ that works with Lightspeed. Alastair Dallas (These are my opinions, not my employer's)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<324@dbase.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!think!bloom-beacon!gatech!udel!burdvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!ashtate!dbase!awdReferences:
<6815@drutx.ATT.COM> <76000138@uiucdcsp> <702@hqda-ai.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!think!bloom-beacon!gatech!udel!burdvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!ashtate!dbase!awd From: awd@dbase.UUCP (Alastair Dallas) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: LightSpeed C, and C++ Message-ID: <324@dbase.UUCP> Date: 5 Mar 88 00:50:45 GMT References: <6815@drutx.ATT.COM> <76000138@uiucdcsp> <702@hqda-ai.UUCP> Organization: Ashton Tate Development Center Glendale Cal. Lines: 9 Summary: No preprocessor!