Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #26044Re: MC68881 vs. XC68881?
From: Jim Cathey
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 1988 02:34
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 1988 02:34
22 lines
1237 bytes
1237 bytes
In article <AWALQby00Xc9y-s0Me@andrew.cmu.edu> rs4u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Richard Siegel) writes: > >Perhaps some Motorola folks can answer this one... > >What's the difference between the MC and the XC designation on the processor >package? I've seen both 68020's and 68881's with the XC part code; what >does it mean? Very possibly this is not a fully-qualified part. I believe the SC68xxx parts are sample parts, from pre-production runs. If they don't work for you, tough bananas and please report your problems to Moto. I am not familiar with the XC parts, but I would expect the same sort of thing. +----------------+ ! II CCCCCC ! Jim Cathey ! II SSSSCC ! ISC Systems Corp. ! II CC ! TAF-C8; Spokane, WA 99220 ! IISSSS CC ! UUCP: uunet!iscuva!jimc ! II CCCCCC ! (509) 927-5757 +----------------+ "With excitement like this, who is needing enemas?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1223@iscuva.ISCS.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!iscuva!jimcReferences:
<AWALQby00Xc9y-s0Me@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!iscuva!jimc From: jimc@iscuva.ISCS.COM (Jim Cathey) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: MC68881 vs. XC68881? Message-ID: <1223@iscuva.ISCS.COM> Date: 8 Mar 88 02:34:12 GMT References: <AWALQby00Xc9y-s0Me@andrew.cmu.edu> Organization: ISC Systems Corporation, Spokane, WA Lines: 22