🚀 go-pugleaf

I find that Turbo Pascal works very well with limited memory and disk space.
Doesn't require that you configure RAMDisks and other stuff. 

In the olden days before I started working at Apple, I developed with
TurboPascal on a 512K Mac  (NOT 512e!)  I distrust using RAMDisks during
development because of the compile-run-CRASH cycle.

If you got more disk space (like 2 floppies) the Symantec THINK products
(did I say that right?  :-)) are easier to use.

Basically, Turbo Pascal is very tiny but packs quite a bit of punch.  It lacks
source level debugging and project management that Lightspeed Pascal has.
Lightspeed C does not (yet) have source level debuggin but is very
fast.

Please mail me if you want more details.  I have development extensively
in my pre-Apple life in Lightspeed Pascal, Turbo Pascal, and Lightspeed C.
Now I use MPW.

I have no connection with Symantec/THINK or Borland.  This is NOT an official
Apple position or endorsement - just my own tuesday night ramblings.


------------------------ Byron Han,  Communications Tool ----------------------
     Apple Computer, Inc.  20525 Mariani Ave, MS 27Y  Cupertino, CA 95014
 ATTnet:408-973-6450    applelink:HAN1    domain:han@apple.COM     MacNET:HAN
GENIE:BYRONHAN   COMPUSERVE:72167,1664   UUCP:{sun,voder,nsc,decwrl}!apple!han
-- 
------------------------ Byron Han,  Communications Tool ----------------------
     Apple Computer, Inc.  20525 Mariani Ave, MS 27Y  Cupertino, CA 95014
 ATTnet:408-973-6450    applelink:HAN1    domain:han@apple.COM     MacNET:HAN
GENIE:BYRONHAN   COMPUSERVE:72167,1664   UUCP:{sun,voder,nsc,decwrl}!apple!han