🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7602@apple.Apple.Com> lsr@apple.UUCP (Larry Rosenstein) writes:
<In article <7481@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> mwm@eris.UUCP (Mike (My watch has windows) Meyer) writes:
<>two-button mouse with no problem. Until you demonstrate that a
<>two-button interface (pop up menus + followmouse, or some such) can be
<>adequately dealt with (by that, I mean that you don't have to drive
<>the window manager with two hands) on a one-button mouse, the
<>one-button mouse will have to be considered inferior. 
<
<This doesn't make sense.  There is no question that the interface you
<describe would not work well on a machine with 1 mouse button.  That doesn't
<make a 2-button mouse or a 2-button interface better.  You would have to do
<an experiment with the Mac interface and the Amiga or Sun interface and see
<how well people perform on the same tasks (ie, selecting a menu item,
<copying data from 1 window to another, etc.).

I should have been clearer. Inferior in this case translates to "it
can't recreate my favorite environmetn, but I can recreate yours." A
two-button mouse mimicing a one-button system just treats all mouse-X
events identically - that way you can't hit the wrong button.

Studies won't change this point. Even if you proof that everyone is
always more productive with a one-button mouse, as long as there are
people who prefer a two-button system, and think they are more
productive with it, the ability to let them configure the system to
their preferences will make that system superior.

	<mike

--
But I'll survive, no you won't catch me,		Mike Meyer
I'll resist the urge that is tempting me,		ucbvax!mwm
I'll avert my eyes, keep you off my knee,		mwm@berkeley.edu
But it feels so good when you talk to me.		mwm@ucbjade.BITNET