🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <407@swanee.OZ> gustav@swanee.OZ (Gustav) writes:
|  Is there any Mac software that matches the functionality of *troff
|  and family? Does anyone out there regularly use embedded citations
|  which are gathered at the end of a document? How about footnotes? 
|  Does it work for a large document (approx 200 double-spaced pages)?
|  What are the pros and cons of either?
[ elided nasty reply about Mac software]

In article <10321@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> zwicky@pterodactyl.cis.ohio-state.edu (Elizabeth D. Zwicky) writes:
| False. I use MacTeX by FTL, which happily (albeit slowly) crunches
| my entire Facilities Guide of nearly 300 pages, pictures, cross-references,
| footnotes, table of contents, fancy fonts and all. 
| The previewer is perfectly good, although all
| the pictures show up as black splotches, and I hate previewing on the
| small screen.

 Good news, the current version displays the pictures you paste in
on top of the (grey) splotches. And the editor has improved, and
they added a MacWrite and MS Word input-translator, and it even runs
faster. About 4 times, according to my stopwatch. (I live in
Toronto, so I went down and benchmarked the critter last year).

  I finally got disgusted with the version(s) on the Vax and put
down a down-payment on MacTeX for our + at work. I expect the Unix
ports to improve, but they've got a long way to go to catch up with
some of the other TeXs.
-- 
 David Collier-Brown.                 {mnetor yunexus utgpu}!geac!daveb
 Geac Computers International Inc.,   |  Computer Science loses its
 350 Steelcase Road,Markham, Ontario, |  memory (if not its mind) 
 CANADA, L3R 1B3 (416) 475-0525 x3279 |  every 6 months.